commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [math] releasing 3.2?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:04:38 GMT
On 3/27/13 8:13 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>>>>>> On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
>>>>>>>> Any thoughts about it?
>>>>>>> How soon?
>>>>>>> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
>>>>>>> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
>>>>>>> There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback
>> (MATH-917).
>>>>>> I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
>>>>> It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will
be
>>>>> resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame would
>> be:
>>>>>   - wrapping up MATH-917 as Thomas proposed,
>>>>>   - finishing MATH-437 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), and perhaps also
>>>>>     MATH-228 at the same time
>>>> See comment just added to MATH-437.  I am working on it, but not
>>>> ready to commit to API, so say bump this to 3.3/4.0.
>>>>
>>>> One thing I did not mention in the MATH-437 comment.  While I think
>>>> we should not do it in the K-S case, because the dist itself has
>>>> little value and much numeric instability, the approximation tricks
>>>> in your patch are interesting and might merit inclusion in
>>>> AbstractRealDistribution (which actually is where the impls belong).
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> can you maybe also take a look at MATH-981? I have already provided a
>>> patch, but would like to hear your opinion on this as it is more a
>>> work-around for the moment.
>> Hmmm.  Can't find 981 and no permutation looks that interesting ;)
>>
> sorry, its MATH-891

Geez.  I can't even do permutations this AM :)

See comments on the ticket.

Phil
>
> Thomas
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message