commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Neidhart <>
Subject Re: [math] releasing 3.2?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:03:06 GMT
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>>> On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>>> Hello.
>>>>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
>>>>> Any thoughts about it?
>>>> How soon?
>>>> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
>>>> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
>>>> There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917).
>>> I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
>> It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be
>> resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame would be:
>>   - wrapping up MATH-917 as Thomas proposed,
>>   - finishing MATH-437 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), and perhaps also
>>     MATH-228 at the same time
> See comment just added to MATH-437.  I am working on it, but not
> ready to commit to API, so say bump this to 3.3/4.0.
> One thing I did not mention in the MATH-437 comment.  While I think
> we should not do it in the K-S case, because the dist itself has
> little value and much numeric instability, the approximation tricks
> in your patch are interesting and might merit inclusion in
> AbstractRealDistribution (which actually is where the impls belong).

Hi Phil,

can you maybe also take a look at MATH-981? I have already provided a
patch, but would like to hear your opinion on this as it is more a
work-around for the moment.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message