Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFC01E3E4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19366 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 10:10:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19268 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 10:10:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19245 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2013 10:10:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:10:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_DBL_REDIR X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jmborer@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.49] (HELO mail-qa0-f49.google.com) (209.85.216.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:10:21 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o13so569088qaj.15 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:10:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=igBr6qXh1DFTL1lXdT/tf6YR4Ti0f+76ucUCrRwuloM=; b=UxnnYrG7W8WolXyjA460Tg7ejgwNjMPIOZeb6QwAGMZAjLHehnwd6TcDFpZSoKS0cU dUANwINFGfoOmmycX3DgxOCXJC73BcyNtHPnjopdGa3/BQgeheeatSpvBwfLuDchxatJ X8ZtZIL8sLkE7Uo9c1MHd0bRXrtJZDiBMmgN0nqhL6vUNfJRQDuqQI36R4nuCnmRjj+E +0CtcJFrq5n8aaP7fJcu8C7oYR25a6MVMtacuK6j+vybnLVWjQqYXXQ4bSDRQGiawgrE 3yC+Rhctj5Oxr65DIrZuQVXvcuI/5naawP1McxPQEavW4utQ6zAGL+afDKwRwztqXDjz MjLw== X-Received: by 10.224.71.20 with SMTP id f20mr13950734qaj.91.1360145400363; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:10:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.74.170 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 02:09:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jean-Marc Borer Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:09:20 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [vfs] New feature request: configurable socket timeout for HTTP and WebDAV in VFS To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I found this entry in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-249 Actually it is not true that it is fixed. Looking at the code Ralph Goers's explanation are not correct. It should be reopened. I will create a new entry. On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > OK. You seem to like the feature. > > Can I provide the patch for integration then? To whom should I send it? > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Mark Fortner wrote: >> Perhaps not for local file systems, but I would imagine that any kind of >> distributed file system would have need of a socket timeout. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Mark Fortner wrote: >>> >>> > Just out of curiousity, is there a reason that socket timeouts shouldn't >>> > also apply to all file systems in general? >>> > >>> >>> How does a socket timeout make sense for a local file system, ZIP, and so >>> on? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Mark >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Sure, make sure you base you patch on the latest from trunk. >>> > > >>> > > Gary >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Jean-Marc Borer >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hello list members, >>> > > > >>> > > > We need to be able to specify socket timeouts in VFS for HTTP and >>> > > > WebDAV in our project so that request will no hang for ever in >>> certain >>> > > > conditions. >>> > > > >>> > > > I have modified the sources of HttpFileSystemConfigBuilder and >>> > > > HttpClientFactory to be able to configure this in HttpClient. >>> > > > >>> > > > Do you want me to propose a patch for that? >>> > > > >>> > > > Cheers, >>> > > > >>> > > > Jean-marc >>> > > > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org >>> > > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >>> > > Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >>> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org >>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >>> Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org