commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:40:14 GMT
2013/1/10 Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:23:26PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>:
>> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> >> 2013/1/9 Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>:
>> >> > 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>:
>> >> >> Hi.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> [...]
>> >> >>> >> > Note: currently some content is imported which
could be removed (I
>> >> >>> >> > think about cobertura for modules which use sonar).
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > What is the status about moving cobertura to
a dedicated profile in
>> >> >>> >> > parent pom ?
>> >> >>> >> > Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent
pom ?
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > For [Math] it would be much better (since AFAIK nobody
came up with a way to
>> >> >>> > disable Cobertura on a per-component basis).
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > From what I infer from looking at the Sonar report page,
we could have the
>> >> >>> > best of all worlds if every Commons project were registered
indepently in
>> >> >>> > Sonar. Currently, there is one "Commons Proper Aggregator
Project
>> >> >>> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT" (which does not represent the actual situation
that the
>> >> >>> > components are independent from each other). However,
it seems that with
>> >> >>> > several projects registered, it could be possible to compare
two versions
>> >> >>> > of the same project, thereby providing complete information
on the evolution
>> >> >>> > of the code. Am I wrong?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Something like https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-exec
>> >> >>> or https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3
>> >> >>> ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What I'd like to be clear on the report page is the release versions
(of
>> >> >> Commons Math): the timelines always refer to a non-existent "1.0-SNAPSHOT".
>> >> >> See e.g.
>> >> >>   https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/122571?did=4&period=3
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I see (this generates extra maintenance on analysis.a.o as I need to
>> >> > created a job per project)
>> >> > But I will
>> >> done see: https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Will there be something to be done for each release, or is there some
>> > automagic link between sonar and Jira (or SVN?) that can remember when some
>> > release happened and add the little triangle?
>> Not sure of that but it looks sonar detect versions from pom.
>> As sample see https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/35142?did=4
>
> That's close, but the ideal would be that official release also appear in
> the tables. And that will not happen by reading the pom file because there,
> the version is always in the form "x.y[.z]-SNAPSHOT".
>
> Would it be possible to request a "one-time" analysis by pointing Sonar to
> the SVN tag of the new official release? [And have that analysis inserted in
> the time-line of course ;-).]
>
on request only :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message