commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:47:50 GMT
Hi.

> >> [...]
> >> > Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I
> >> > think about cobertura for modules which use sonar).
> >> >
> >> > What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile in
> >> > parent pom ?
> >> > Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent pom ?
> >> >
> >
> > For [Math] it would be much better (since AFAIK nobody came up with a way to
> > disable Cobertura on a per-component basis).
> >
> > From what I infer from looking at the Sonar report page, we could have the
> > best of all worlds if every Commons project were registered indepently in
> > Sonar. Currently, there is one "Commons Proper Aggregator Project
> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT" (which does not represent the actual situation that the
> > components are independent from each other). However, it seems that with
> > several projects registered, it could be possible to compare two versions
> > of the same project, thereby providing complete information on the evolution
> > of the code. Am I wrong?
> 
> Something like https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-exec
> or https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3
> ?

What I'd like to be clear on the report page is the release versions (of
Commons Math): the timelines always refer to a non-existent "1.0-SNAPSHOT".
See e.g.
  https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/122571?did=4&period=3


Regards,
Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message