Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AA10D116 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87888 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2012 18:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 87732 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2012 18:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 87718 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2012 18:55:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:55:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.43] (HELO mail-pb0-f43.google.com) (209.85.160.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:55:44 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id um15so2836325pbc.30 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dNnFlMd6B+h1JvmdYp/jU61pK+hWuwuOjNcr2pYp2rs=; b=qAm/Tf7Jd1LmGqzeH/ZpC2o6WtVCAZXy/VnP/W29j/qC2OnJHwPozQdiG8HQvkgNTl 3VD3U3DalTKZeFbeNytC1rECzGA1xah4CyOwU58U1tbOWlraz5PaZM+5f/SVer7F8bGv YMhC1ctqBlozdg5iqUCK1LrDQLiwEFduyA101iATKTvhpTA/a3Wrx7A5HjMABafY2eZE qUtIg9jfedN9CPn+tGEfl0n8RnnAu7uC1UBJMNB/1Rf0iWM+qFMfyJpewTS7i/no9KSg Lm1b2p5mHy2JVU+XM98Tsw40QynXJ/0rBBlx50dy86yyp/Ub804LtmPPSJNybiVQhzMn QVpQ== Received: by 10.68.225.201 with SMTP id rm9mr27563972pbc.124.1355597723682; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.107] (ip72-208-109-243.ph.ph.cox.net. [72.208.109.243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ai8sm5106723pbd.14.2012.12.15.10.55.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:55:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50CCC797.9020203@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:55:19 -0800 From: Phil Steitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] missing deprecations? References: <50CC12A2.90409@gmail.com> <20121215120703.GB13350@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <50CCAA71.9070901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50CCAA71.9070901@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/15/12 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/15/12 4:07 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> The classes in .optimization.fitting seem to have been duplicated / >>> moved to .fitting, but the originals are not deprecated (though some >>> methods in them are). Shouldn't we deprecate the original classes? >> Yes. In fact, all the classes under "o.a.c.m.optimization" are deprecated; >> I intended to mark them as such, but somehow got distracted by other >> things... ;-) >> Thanks for the reminder. >> >>> Also, @since for the moved versions should be 3.1, correct? >> It depends what is meant by "@since"... Is it the appearance of a new >> feature (algorithm or data structure), or the actual naming or renaming >> of a class or method? [There are arguments for each, but both cannot be >> accomodated with a single tag.] > Good point. I would say leave the moved version @since tags as is. >> In the former case, the answer to your question would be no since it is a >> only a refactoring of existing features. >> >> In the latter, we'd have a problem: many "@since" tags are 1.2, 2.0, ... >> whereas they should _all_ be 3.0 because of the package name change (from >> "o.a.c.math" to "o.a.c.math3"). >> Since that had not been a blocker for a major release, I propose that we >> postpone the resolution of this situation to the next release (opening a >> JIRA report) or until we are sure how to best use "@since" must be used in >> CM. > I need a couple more hours to review and fill in the rest of the > missing ones. Done. Phil > > Phil > > >> >> Regards, >> Gilles >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org