commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sébastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>
Subject Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Math 3.1 (take 4)
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:26:54 GMT
Hi Gilles,

I cannot reproduce these failures either. Here is my config
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
Java version: 1.7.0_05
Java home: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_05/jre
Default locale: fr_FR, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux" version: "3.6.9-2.fc17.x86_64" arch: "amd64" Family: "unix"

Sébastien


2012/12/20 Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>

> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > > Le 19/12/2012 22:04, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Luc Maisonobe <
> Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr>wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Le 19/12/2012 11:03, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> > > >>> Hi.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please have a look at the latest candidate (RC4), and vote for
the
> > > >> release
> > > >>> of Commons Math 3.1.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----------
> > > >>> Tag:
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_RC4/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Site:
> > > >>>   http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1/RC4/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Binaries:
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-048/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.1/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [X] +1 Release it.
> > > >>
> > > >> There are a few missing headers, but only in test files, so I don't
> > > >> think it is a blocker.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I'm not so sure, missing headers on .java are a must IMO.
> > >
> > > I have fixed them in trunk, as well as a few checkstyle errors I missed
> > > earlier.
> >
> > The CheckStyle warnings were probably a consequence of fixing the Clirr
> > errors.
> >
> > Do we stand with your previous statement that missing headers on test
> files
> > were not a blocker?  IIRC, this was the conclusion for release 3.0. Those
> > headers have been missing for a long time. The JIRA report will avoid
> that
> > for next time.
>
> Well, last time, the Java files were indeed corrected to contain a license
> header. [The data files were deemed OK without it.]
>
> I'll create a new tag.
>
> Can someone check the problems found by Oliver on M$-Windows?
>
>
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message