commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William Speirs <wspe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0
Date Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:12:06 GMT
Adding named params won't break things (actually I was thinking of adding
this to a 1.x release as well), but removing deprecated code will. Also, I
was thinking of switching to only supporting named params in the 2.x branch.

I guess the real question is, do folks think that forcing the use of named
params and switching to a groupid to org.apache is enough benefit for the
cost?

My vote, yes... keep a 1.x branch around for those who cannot or won't
change, and 2.x for those who can.

Bill-
On Dec 13, 2012 8:04 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:

> We only need to change the coordinates if the package name changes to
> account for BC breakage.
>
> Gary
>
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 17:47, William Speirs <wspeirs@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I just submitted
> > DBUTILS-105<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-105> to
> > add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped
> > that up with DBUTILS-95 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-95>
> > and DBUTILS-92 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92> it
> would
> > be worth cutting a new major version.
> >
> > Also, we should switch the maven convention which probably means changing
> > to commons-dbutils2 much like was done with lang.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Bill-
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message