commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Math 3.1
Date Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:39:07 GMT
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:09:54PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 04:03 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2012 01:42 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> Please have a look at the Commons Math 3.1 release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Note about the web site: I've now found that the problem reported in
> >>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-912
> >>> originates from not updating
> >>>   src/site/site.xml
> >>> For this RC, I manually changed the "index.html" in the staging area (so
> >>> that the site will have the link to the new apidocs named correctly).
> >>> As this does not touch the artefacts, I hope that this small glitch[1] will
> >>> not require a new RC.[2]
> >>>
> >>> ----------
> >>> Tag:
> >>>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_RC1/
> >>>
> >>> Site:
> >>>   http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1/RC1/
> >>>
> >>> Binaries:
> >>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-023/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.1/
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release it.
> >>> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
> >>> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
> >>> [x] -1 No, do not release it because ...
> >>
> >> there are several clirr errors reported in:
> >>
> >>  * DifferentiableUnivariateFunction
> >>  * LogNormalDistribution
> >>  * NormalDistribution
> >>
> >> which are not clear to me, and are also not mentioned in the release notes.
> > 
> > I agree that in the first instances, no change should have been done (the
> > more so that they are modifications of deprecated methods).
> > 
> > The last two are false positives, for some unknown reason.
> > 
> >> Some findbugs warnings have been introduced due to the copy of classes
> >> to the new optim package, the exclude list should be adapted.
> > 
> > Done.
> > 
> >>
> >> the changes.xml does not specify a release date for 3.1
> > 
> > Done. (Look at the date! ;-)
> > 
> >> the tagged pom.xml does not specify the correct scm connection (to the
> >> final release tag) - just a minor glitch.
> > 
> > I don't quite understand this one. [IIUC, I don't see why those should be
> > adapted to the tag (which is not supposed to be changed).]
> > If someone thinks that this is really a release blocker, please give an
> > explanation on the reason (and the right way to update it).
> 
> It is just a minor thing, but I found it in one of the release guides. I
> think most of the releases have missed it so far. The scm links should
> be updated to the final release tag, e.g.:
> 
>   <scm>
> 
> <connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</connection>
> 
> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</developerConnection>
> 
> <url>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</url>
>   </scm>
> 
> I do not think it is a blocker, but when you prepare the next RC you
> could also adapt these links.

It was not in my release recipe (and probably not in "UsingNexus" on which I
based my previous, and first, attempt to prepare a release). So I'll wait
for a rationale. [IMHO, and IIUC (which is not sure of course), in CM, there
is reason not to point people to a tag...]


Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message