commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [all] moving to svnpubsub or CMS?
Date Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:16:25 GMT
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> >> This is a false dichotomy.
> >>
> >> Maven site generation can work with ASF CMS if desired.
> >
> > That is sort of true but doesn't really apply to commons.  I created the
> Flume site using Maven and Maven generates the site from RST source files.
>  This isn't a typical Maven project site.  In essence it is a CMS project
> that happens to invoke Maven whenever content is changed.
> >
> > IMO the Logging project site is a lot closer to what Commons needs.  The
> top level site is managed by the CMS.  Each of the project sites is built
> by Maven and is directly checked into the production area and each is
> independently managed.  See
> http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite
>
> Agree on this option (this what we experimented with maven too: not yet
> live)
>

This hybrid approach is what I was referring to.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message