commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [privilizer] promotion plan
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:55:55 GMT
Another aspect to consider is would this new "privalizer" component (not
crazy about the name ATM) fit in an existing Commons component?


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>   As long as I've been part of the Commons community I don't know that I've
> encountered this exact situation:  a committer adds some code to the
> sandbox that is more or less complete.  I don't know precisely what
> requirements must be met before we promote [privilizer] to proper. We seem
> to have interest from one or more members of the PMC as prospective users;
> this would seem to imply that were I hit by a bus there ought to be someone
> interested in maintaining the component.  Speaking for BVal I intend to put
> this component to immediate use there (that's what I wrote it for!).  Mark
> has mentioned that OWB and perhaps other ASF projects might want to make
> use of it.  What else do I need to do?
>
> Matt
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message