commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From S├ębastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>
Subject Re: [Math] Towards release 3.1
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:10:52 GMT
Hi Gilles,

2012/9/12 Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>:
> Hello.
>
> This thread was left alone for some time, although the main issue was not
> settled: I requested the release of a new version of CM.
>
> I quote my remarks from an earlier message in this thread:
>
>> [...] issues resulted in some work being done, [...]
>> My opinion is that releases must reflect that fact. Or, conversely, only
>> "nothing new happened" is a reason for not providing a new release.
>>
>> Of course, there should be a balance between the work imposed by preparing a
>> release, and the updated contents to be released. I think that the trade-off
>> is already largely positive.
>
> and
>
>> > > "Wish" or "improvement" issues that miss a patch should not be blocking
the
>> > > 3.1 release.
>
> and
>
>> Of course, I'd be all for setting a date for release 3.2 too!
>
> Context:
> I have to abide by the requirement to use an _official_ release of CM and my
> code relies on bug fixes present in the development version.
>
> Are there any technical reasons to object to the starting of the release
> process?
>
If you did not have this precise requirement, I would have been a bit
reluctant to release 3.1 in the middle of MATH-854. Considering your
situation, I don't see any real objection on my side.
(Sparse vectors *will* be deprecated, as only Phil answered, but this
will wait until 3.2...).
S├ębastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message