Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 261CF96F9 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 02:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42776 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2012 02:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 42683 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2012 02:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 42674 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2012 02:40:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:40:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:40:08 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so5512945obq.30 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 19:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=vTUdXqHl9uzUaWpiSCmygkEk22aNycahHSb9XthA75M=; b=RlxboZCWWie8h7mA4isKbv6c/TkfRxJ6h7/SaA1uQvksjPkT2rPTefwyb65h1holWp jZcGq0LiRi/i5bI9etJjaaHVATz//oT+qKnlpEf5JsIbyviwCyd+aRXHmocigkreWkgt n8xLMsYZ8gshCDLaGbAlRwDZdhODOONOdbvymW5RVhsPW+lW+R2zozHqzfsM+6q1TWvV yPP0/ZBmS7Q105Vm03wfwlyRzrYi3d0U4kQAxnSZ1B0t0kbFC8gf9R7nUX5MWsyhHqpM 3XQTh/bhxr0IN/PCqdas1VLVavS0ZUQXzFB2LhQb2dVh8scf0D7qVoUkgXQYnY7ewSJ9 FzjA== Received: by 10.60.2.161 with SMTP id 1mr13122373oev.48.1344134388093; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 19:39:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.12.197 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 19:39:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120804231607.GA25337@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> References: <20120804185743.GZ25337@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <501D9BCD.3020706@gmail.com> <20120804231607.GA25337@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 20:39:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-610 (please vote) To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f923de4bb93be04c67bacc6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f923de4bb93be04c67bacc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sounds right. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Gilles Sadowski < gilles@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > No strong objections, but I see it as needless code bloat > > personally. Also, without changing visibility (which I am -1 on) > > for the inner class, I don't see an easy way to add tests for the > > proposed new code. > > Then I would rephrase: > Has anyone an objection to resolving MATH-610 as "Won't fix"? --e89a8f923de4bb93be04c67bacc6--