Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B32ADE5E for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35261 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 03:19:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 35067 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 03:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 35030 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2012 03:19:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:19:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of SRS0=XiAc=G7=m4x.org=sebastien.brisard@bounces.m4x.org designates 129.104.30.34 as permitted sender) Received: from [129.104.30.34] (HELO mx1.polytechnique.org) (129.104.30.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:19:36 +0000 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 329AE14045561 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 05:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by iabz25 with SMTP id z25so5516879iab.30 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:19:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.95.231 with SMTP id dn7mr582461igb.37.1346383154024; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.141.167 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:19:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120830094405.GH24856@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> References: <20120830094405.GH24856@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 05:19:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [math] Binary or text resource files? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Brisard?= To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Fri Aug 31 05:19:15 2012 +0200 (CEST)) X-Org-Mail: sebastien.brisard.1997@polytechnique.org X-Old-Spam-Flag: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000426, queueID=854AF14045563 2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski : > Hello. > >> testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned >> by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision >> software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests >> to be assesments of the overall accuracy of our implementations, the >> number of test values is quite large. > > How large? > For example, testing of GammaDistribution involves some *.csv files, the largest of which is 300kb. This might not be so huge in the end (although the svn commit log is quite large!). BTW, you might notice that I've committed this morning a new *.csv file. I'm not taking decisions without waiting for everyone's ascent, I'm merely extending some tests which were already using resource files. If we decide for another option, I'll change all of this together. Best regards, S=E9bastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org