Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88085DAB5 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44587 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2012 23:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 44491 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2012 23:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 44483 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2012 23:51:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:51:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.74.71.27] (HELO eir.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:50:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scarlet.be; s=scarlet; t=1345765832; bh=akb+LZLnV321KwaxT45g0zEtzrysoQ+sdo09edYfpQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=09L5GH5abIw2pf7xp8CGEJSBgE3BdLnj5OeUfG4a4BIjrXmRHL8HSNt3nyBVDgJAf BoZnBzbJW+CK4QIx8KA2DeMfy83Zm7Civ7mc+GwUW4h9sdvKTddPBYXykj21S6meLl UlkT6UvlQ+AywnGyhgqzitqHYhdP6QqLUS/cMRxw= Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org (ip-62-235-198-184.dsl.scarlet.be [62.235.198.184]) by eir.is.scarlet.be (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7NNoVOj009403 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:32 +0200 X-Scarlet: d=1345765832 c=62.235.198.184 Received: from localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4790061833 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.harfang.homelinux.org ([192.168.20.11]) by localhost (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7x7zDbur7YhP for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dusk.harfang.homelinux.org (mail.harfang.homelinux.org [192.168.20.11]) by mail.harfang.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567E3617E4 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eran by dusk.harfang.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T4hAT-0001qJ-7N for dev@commons.apache.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:29 +0200 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:50:28 +0200 From: Gilles Sadowski To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: [math] Formatting Message-ID: <20120823235028.GT24856@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org References: <50369D8E.3070804@gmail.com> <20120823230220.GR24856@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <5036B8A9.9060207@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5036B8A9.9060207@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Tiny Tux X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 53B9 972E C2E6 B93C BEAD 7092 09E6 AF46 51D0 5641 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: eir 20001; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1-exp at eir X-Virus-Status: Clean > > [...] > > Think about it from the standpoint of a new contributor. How long > does it take to prepare and get a patch committed for a) the new > contributor and b) the committer who ends up applying the patch. > More rules means more time. It is that simple. Either the new > contributor has to keep fixing his or her patch so it complies with > all of the rules or the committer applying it does that. In either > case, friction is introduced. Fewer rules means less friction, > which IMO is more important than cosmetics. There is friction if everyone wants to stick with his own style. And there is friction when one has to read poorly written code, just the same as if you'd have to read a document with one word in black, then one in red, followed by one in italic, then one in bold, one in a 12-points font, one in 14-points font, one in times and one in roman, etc. There is reason for formatting rules: make a pleasant read. People have to make a little effort e.g. to type LaTeX code so that the _reader_ can be more confortable. [And the effort is much less when writing Javadoc.] The actual style is not so important as having a _single one_ (per project, per programming language). Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org