Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F44ED962 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80401 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 16:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 80246 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 16:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 80238 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2012 16:05:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:05:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dantran@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.43] (HELO mail-yw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.213.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:05:39 +0000 Received: by yhl10 with SMTP id 10so2361654yhl.30 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cve1f1U7iW5iNANOktO/xemAFhAjBtq05RInGv0ng3g=; b=J9xCmR9zWfcgYf0Id9PFJoqD+9BeBwt2Ts3yeHd66pRbYMBe8YveWZFG5J9zIuve0G 0mxFiqOiUE2z6o/sLlZDcMt5kICbfD4g5gkJ/PO9GiuU/sASaHCNDwNbb1FbrLCBuP/B p8cpaV+lCR0ouQ8Ztm2C0lH1rHlhR197PTsm9LyBY51VvjfQFvMRiKuPcBDTx/DbdE0F 0NPEgElZSXDipI/Fjn6FXvdxXiqkYlAfUUWTYyowmg3clm3BQQ7kn+4eJuYXCVljDFoF aNPs4uZZxnA7xT7uVYAgKJSQT0a3T2DJCPWI3zHNaLsGRGkjbXfe8fvQWhMKMaeIyqft K/6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.223.198 with SMTP id qw6mr8644935pbc.94.1342627518380; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.18.104 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:05:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2755276513099367348@unknownmsgid> References: <2755276513099367348@unknownmsgid> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:05:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Promote vfs-cift out of sandbox? From: Dan Tran To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am confuse here, you are asking me to embed a cifs server ( which have not found a java implementation yet, jcifs itself only contain client part ), and someone's SMB server. These 2 are contradicting. Am I missing something? Thanks -D On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:05, Dan Tran wrote: > >> Questions: >> >> 1. So that i can plan out our own release, what is the 'potential' >> time frame we may see another release of VFS? > > Any time. Rolling a release takes anywhere from a week or a couple of > weeks depending on what needs to be done. > > For the next release, likely called 2.1, I see some clean ups to do > but not too much. > >> >> 2. In term of test. Are you suggesting me to use a embedded CIFS >> server or use 'someone' SMB server? > > Yes, a server embedded into the tests. As I pointed out previously, > please see the HTTP and FTP tests. > > Gary > >> >> Thanks >> >> -D >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Ideally: >>> >>> - Implement the test case such that it starts and stops an embedded Samba >>> server, like other tests do (see HTTP, FTP, and so on.) This will require >>> using someone's Smb server. >>> >>> Once that is in place: >>> >>> - Migrate to the current version of JCIFS. >>> >>> Then: >>> >>> - Fill in holes in tests (if any) >>> - Fill in holes in features (if any as your needs dictate) >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a forked a copy of vfs-cift to codehaus [1] to test it out. It >>>> works so far for me. >>>> >>>> What would it take to promote the current VFS's CIFT out of sandbox to >>>> be released with VFS-2.x? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> [1] https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/vfs/vfs-smb/ >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org >>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >>> Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org