Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8BBDD449 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5397 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 23:12:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 5177 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 23:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 5169 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2012 23:12:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:12:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.171] (HELO mail-vc0-f171.google.com) (209.85.220.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:12:54 +0000 Received: by vcdd16 with SMTP id d16so1471684vcd.30 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:12:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FdU72iNdXT5mFEcUmE8pIG6bdbZaEi2meMdy4neC6I0=; b=r6AcXf4NNlZTGiiuMh3E5zy0Hc/jGVjfkJEW5DttkZ9L2mZFVBjOEPCirzN7FvPWcr GW5yV5wHPsJwHMRWTz14zUVLYtzlaMW2+8HHEfGteOJQ9NvLwV4b6kRFauPjeJvoQfjK riX/GNJ3WA/B4Y7rrexbvToAY76bLtwDdU3nSf5EARXbnMzDGhk83NrMYgfZ6iEbhehD aekEgjQLfeVaHqGoYz+jF3kssEhmvqWTFq3Gav8v6P2K1aJ5jT5AxG+DMHjBzbWoa6Us WwuqSieH/4c8VUNbYPFEV2wFLSNcJajC6uy7Au7bFLzZSm2M5YRY/Xu20wKUfclIpsMy sEAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.69.237 with SMTP id h13mr1635419vdu.82.1342653153200; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.135.229 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:12:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:12:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [chain] javadoc tags From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 18 July 2012 21:35, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hello, > > we discussed already a lot on this for other components, anyway it > would be better discussing it before modifying the code: > > * is it OK to drop @author tags? original authors, committers and > contributors are already mentioned in the pom > > * @version: actually, there is a mix of $Id$, $Revision$ and $Date$ > usage. Is it OK to replace all of them with $Id$ only? So long as the $Date$ ones are removed, I don't think it matters whether the others use Revision or Id. > TIA! best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org