commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Liviu Tudor <liviu.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [pool] Question / potential improvement on KeyedObjectPool
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:39:37 GMT
Thanks, Mark, that makes sense!

In that case I will apply all the patches to 1.5 too.

Thanks everyone for helping with this!


Liv 
 
Liviu Tudor
 
E: liviu.tudor@gmail.com
C: +1 650-2833815 (USA)
M: +44 (0)7591540313 (UK, Europe)
W: http://about.me/liviutudor
Skype: liviutudor
 
I'm nobody, nobody's perfect -- therefore I'm perfect!

 





On 30/07/2012 14:37, "Mark Thomas" <markt@apache.org> wrote:

>On 30/07/2012 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Liviu Tudor <liviu.tudor@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> Mark/Gary/Seb,
>>>
>>> Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
>>> these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
>>> the pom and also uses Junit 4.10).
>>>
>>> So in the light of these, should I:
>>>
>>> 1/ also apply these patches to the 1.5 branch?
>>>
>> 
>> Up to you.
>> 
>> 
>>> 2/ downgrade junit to 3.8.2 on the 1.6 branch?
>>>
>> 
>> I do not think so, this branch is for Java >= 1.5. Why? Does JUnit 4.10
>>not
>> run on Java 5?
>
>1.6.x is meant to be 1.5.x plus generics. The more they diverge, the
>harder they will be to keep in sync.
>
>Mark
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message