commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <>
Subject Re: [pool][dbcp] Move AbandonedObjectPool in v 2's?
Date Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:33:11 GMT
On 22/07/2012 22:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
> One more quick question as I begin hacking:
> Currently, abandoned object recuperation is triggered by
> borrowObject in AOP.   I am thinking about moving this to the
> evictor.  Or I guess it could be in both places?

The third option is a separate thread. That feels like overkill.

The evictor is the natural place for this although not everyone wants to
use an evictor. How feasible is use the evictor but do it on
borrowObject() if an evictor is not configured?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message