Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2884CC7EA for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82756 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82654 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82645 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:41:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.171] (HELO mail-gh0-f171.google.com) (209.85.160.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:41:21 +0000 Received: by ghy10 with SMTP id 10so2084172ghy.30 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:41:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nXCkmzrEjQtVrGpbVc7t/R3aHHj5wj4WfiTs8C9YQm4=; b=zP5lJmEb9muEQRmmXt2d6Ig7BYl2WKjPUIeidBlFx7CzmjHjrmnhGJCpmrLATuNpGh Czm4Mlo55AL+KWmY34j9tsg4nDHY04i0mHxJgAJ9P2jdu9V5sMFGjf/pIUUtHcsIVaL+ s0g5sKNn5FLm0RLfeL6PlUovsBjCENifS88D04+9dfv9zAgX6X9WqesDVKzrK7Pwb4Pj IjHwIwyQXYtZ20EhkX0NG98YkKjACu0A36/+t6gHZvh3OdLdZd7rVtUX1IIw8iHS6Xfu NJgcQ7KqG3KRkzI2Yaz//JBWpuyGP4nN/lXPfb0VwZznD+V8xtisTREbpyZ4HnSXpokk cVqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr3379100igc.50.1339195260180; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:41:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.21.167 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:41:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:41:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [scxml] why in all test case there is instead of From: Rahul Akolkar To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Alessandro Scarozza wrote: > the question is simple: > > in w3c standard the final state is: > > but in all test case there is: > > > it also seems that by the final attribute does not work, while using > the tag final works fine > > long story short: > commons scxml are according to W3C > test case are wrong > > Is that so? > In the earliest drafts of the SCXML specification, the syntax with the final attribute was used, those test cases that use the syntax were written then and use the older version of the Commons SCXML parser. The new parser may not recognize the old syntax. -Rahul > -- > Alessandro Scarozza > http://www.google.com/profiles/xan.scale > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org