Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80FD7C669 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56717 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2012 12:44:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 56610 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2012 12:44:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 56591 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2012 12:44:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:44:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [184.154.208.37] (HELO delivery.mailspamprotection.com) (184.154.208.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:44:45 +0000 Received: from ns1.siteground309.com ([184.154.233.20] helo=serv01.siteground309.com) by se6.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sim8x-0001c3-H1 for dev@commons.apache.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:44:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandglass-software.com; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=GBWFwz2GLYYuBrWJ5SgPOd1I5W9Cj8T1as6PlEAFaho=; b=oyd4vwCG+l8LIJB0smAQdBo9HOiuzX9o4ukOo1xHXsD2qm5+j/qEoidMS7hDu2p+LqAHLgFk2xqgDgTDQdh3gtasHIJ3ig//AQHpJryjFIJsafWZeryZBp3DGKAPYqxMrgh8LjUkXl9PssJnl06s0WFRFdHTI0WrVrpHkUNq07g=; Received: from [86.182.217.98] (port=2543 helo=[192.168.1.64]) by serv01.siteground309.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sim8y-0007Hk-1A for dev@commons.apache.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:42:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4FE70B2A.1090308@sandglass-software.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:42:18 +0100 From: Adrian Crum Organization: Sandglass Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk References: <4FE6DDBA.4000803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv01.siteground309.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - commons.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sandglass-software.com X-Filter-ID: XtLePq6GTMn8G68F0EmQvYAgAWPFUAzp+Jo6fAgZIhdAY1BaLfwb0I4SZzVEHfhbITx1A9a4ShBP XO22k6PcG+P0qq0TQmXtujrP3JhXfFBQklIO0zDZIPkc/FQViMV6PmPkSGfYD/FnyXwEc05LTfbj aPZXen3YvWHScRpGw7ArlvtkBH6P1cOoerhI7Sr4iv5+2/lCauqT/ywXGvL2+RxwEiTVJqDh0qKo KsXx5ln/9vQ5EPFfTsW9KxP0Dz/YyN7MTyxlD5R9QfXsxSLdPkh2iOE5sPCZ2m0llTG0KA/3K7c+ w3qs5s7L8fDiSW7IGYNOyLHB2ApWzQo+oj1XBIRFxnFgf3mFn8SE/FpZnO4x5TcWnVD/AkzLUcWu O5SvidpeCSV8ebVcflpSgW8HfD22I91AlLit0XguIykqXwpo9qUFE8XEupMgL9lQhc5MjjNGEyuH YBYKsOxvoWcOEuYVqm8VGG4Z1vGC+zYZdWMsPvVBLWN/TyfohSqGvlLNltlDxPr7EFTox0KAfJCi OS8ZNKdscArAr1b2RHQx/zcdxA86IawACGihszh0hOI+rSOIPpeqwlm2NDGXIJ2x7FiQO9wJp9da LyL7X/+MhLKgctUxbdxx5MIfozY1Lg7mONlFFePklm68ldn5RMRGQIlJp0B+1j6r5kwZVGszxfo= X-Originating-IP: 184.154.233.20 X-SpamExperts-Domain: siteground309.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 184.154.233.20 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass () smtp.auth=184.154.233.20 X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: CRM114 (8.2157) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: > On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk >> to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions: >> >> - there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level >> to Java 1.6 would allow the use of @Override in more places (instead >> of putting a /** {inheritDoc} */ everywhere) > AFAICT Javadoc is automatically inherited for methods that implement > an interface. > Being able to add @Override to an interface implementation does not > gain anything. True, you don't gain anything in JavaDocs, but it is still worth adding because the compiler will let you know if your implementation does not match the interface. -Adrian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org