commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: which artifact repository to get commons-io from?
Date Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:59:20 GMT
On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>> <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it...
>>>
>>> Any problems, you could use help with?
>>>
>>
>> Well, yes, all the help I can get! I asked for help on repository@a.o [1]
>>
>> I had initially mentioned the issue on this ML [2] and went to
>> repository@a.o at Sebb's suggestion.
>
> Gary,
>
> just an idea: for log4j I created a so called bundle and uploaded it
> manually to Nexus.
>
> I did it with: jar cf log4j-bundle-1217.jar *
> for all my artifacts.
> Then I went over to repository.apache.org and uploaded it there via
> the web interface. The
> content gets staged again afterwards.
>
> Would this be an option for you in this case?

But that would not be something we had voted on.

I think there are 2 options here:

1) delete the sources jar for which the .asc file was deleted, and
release without the sources jar.

This will be a nuisance for some users, but the source is still
available via the non-Maven dist package.
It won't affect run-time usage.

Not sure there is a requirement to release source to Maven.
This needs to be established first.

2) If the sources file is required, then I think the only solution is
to recreate the staging repo.
If this can be done without changing the hashes and asc files - and it
can be shown that these are the same as the ones voted on - then there
is probably no need to re-run the vote.

Otherwise, I think there should be a vote, because the Maven release
includes source.

Obviously option 1 is the simplest, if it is acceptable.

AIUI, only releases with a proper PMC vote are official releases, for
which the ASF takes responsibility.

> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-repository/201206.mbox/%3CCACZkXPxoQ1nHXqJOLmBJ295Bscjv07Vc5aBqja05ZEWkE9c4YQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> *
>> *[2]
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACZkXPwL3UMF2En0tEjiptuK-jMnA=_dGyJdSEknwJKQPCXNsQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> In other words: what could be seen as a socially debilitating failure
>>> of character can certainly work to your advantage too. (Linus
>>> Torvalds, but the use in the signature tells something about me as
>>> well.)
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message