commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Ring <...@jdns.org>
Subject Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:45:09 GMT
Has anybody looked at the Java 7 NIO File API?

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/package-summary.html

I think VFS should be able to make great contributions to that by
porting filesystem implementations to it.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:46 AM, garydgregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> (posting from nabble as I've lost the thread in my inbox)
>
> I want to revive using Java 6 this for trunk. Java 5 is dead, no only is
> forcing projects to update to the trunk stream from VFS 2.0.
>
> In addition to the list below:
>
> - Make VFS more attractive for new user/developers, new committers in the
> 21st century. No one can force anyone to upgrade to the next version.
> - Keep VFS relevant. The older versions are still there for volunteers to
> patch.
> - Open the door for newer versions of jars that required Java 6, like
> commons-io 2.3.
>
> *I want to use Java 6 @Override on more methods which I find extremely
> helpful.*
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> --
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed
>> prior to the change. A
>
>
> This has been backed out of SVN for now.
>
> (from the JIRA:)
>
> Whys:
> - Make VFS more attractive for new user/developers, new committers in the
> 21st century. No one can force anyone to upgrade to the next version.
> - Keep VFS relevant. The older versions are still there for volunteers to
> patch.
> - Open the door for newer versions of jars that required Java 6, like
> commons-io 2.3.
>
> Gary
>
>
>> s a rule the minimum version should only be changed if something requires
>> it. I'm waiting for a response from Gary as to why this was necessary
>> before asking him to revert it.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On May 14, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Andreas Persson <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >> FYI: I've updated VFS trunk to Java 6 to avoid getting stuck on older
>> >> versions of jars and further moving VFS in the 21st century ;) Tasked
>> >> as VFS-415.
>> >
>> > I was happy to see VFS-414 and VFS-313 being fixed, thank you very much
>> for that! The change in VFS-415 however makes it impossible for us to use
>> VFS 2.1 (we have several jboss 4 installations left, and jboss 4 doesn't
>> support jdk 6). I just wanted you to know that there still are VFS users
>> that depend on jdk 1.5 compatibility.
>> >
>> > /Andreas
>> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk-to-Java-6-tp4629464p4635119.html
> Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message