commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: POOL2 release plan
Date Fri, 04 May 2012 16:11:50 GMT


sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 13/04/2012 22:16, markt@apache.org wrote:
>>> sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE
>>>>> 2. Clean up the docs. DONE
>>>>> 3. Release 2.0.0.M1
>>
>> I think we are ready for an alpha release of POOL2. I'm leaning
>towards
>> Alpha since I don't believe POOL2 is feature complete - specifically
>I'm
>> expecting to add some abandoned object tracking to POOL2.
>
>Does Alpha mean we don't guarantee binary compatibiity?

Until we do a non-alpha/beta release I don't think we guarantee anything.

>BTW, I'm seeing test errors on Win XP:
>
>Failed tests:
> testMinIdle(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>Should be 5 idle, found 0
>testMinIdleMaxTotalPerKey(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>Should be 5 idle, found 0
>testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>expected:<0> but was:<1>

OK. I'll take a look. I haven't run them in a few days and was expecting the CI to flag up
problems.

>
>Tests in error:
>testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool):
>factory may not be null
>
>The last one is probably a test bug, as the ctor specifically rejects
>null factory.

+1. I think I added that recently.

>> The only stumbling block is I don't have the first clue how to do the
>> release. Any pointers and/or offers of help.
>
>I can probably help with that.

Excellent. Thanks.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message