commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles Sadowski <>
Subject Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?
Date Wed, 09 May 2012 10:40:11 GMT
> >> the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
> >> MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
> >>
> >
> > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the
> > already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for
> > the constant.
> >
> In fact, I've realized that I have accidentally committed the
> lanczos() function in r1334315, which has nothing to do with this
> matter (that revision was about MATH-784). In fact, double
> lanczos(double) is indeed new.
> I will try to revert the change in Gamma in r1334315, and commit it in
> a new revision, once we all agree that double lanczos(double) can be
> exposed.
> So the question is: do you like this function lanczos (and its
> Javadoc) or not. Do you agree with this method being public?

"public" is preferrable to duplicate code (if that's the question...).


> [...]

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message