Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 262F19ED3 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 05:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20089 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 05:44:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19875 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 05:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19848 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2012 05:44:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:44:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.52] (HELO mail-pz0-f52.google.com) (209.85.210.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:44:03 +0000 Received: by dake40 with SMTP id e40so4532156dak.39 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JYfVLTBcDpSz1kuSA8/xYn2y5+v5dYNGpIRLWVMnjkY=; b=v2F+R5munmUs297UFNYoJ7iAbCS2YRV8CsKDt81cQZlSy+EXbEC6M3ggOptWXYq6zc e7tVL0mk1Orrh/RYBS5up8MCdgOjnsrAIhy4Q+7FX5vLnGQqJcL27xle4Z+Mg6ABsfBb SmOo5i1U2lCwvinep6x4r1Ll3+HKMoydKyXD1Jq89sJY0mjxmamq0pb5PEMsJmsXA0yR wXWX7LNAb1fH5VObCBYW2DcM/FodvwoS0pZjGfxCT2jgJCRZy26UDletTVXuDFnDlCax bGJbIsv2cf6RUGvoawhb7dgjRKGyVkQVUSMnTn07FnIPPXeObV6j8Ohxnk4pcCj3vNaO G5Gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.125.195 with SMTP id ms3mr16319213pbb.62.1333950210852; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.26.41 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 22:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4F826C3A.9040205@yahoo.com.br> References: <4F826C3A.9040205@yahoo.com.br> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 00:43:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [functor] Distribute tests from TestAlgorithms into several test classes under algorithm test package From: Matt Benson To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds good, Bruno. Can you file/attach in JIRA? Matt On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > Hi all, > > The test class o.a.c.functor.TestAlgorithms contains tests for several > algorithms (Retain Matching, Remove Matching, Predicated Loop, among > others), and it is not using generics. > > I think it would be simpler to have the tests created as > o.a.c.functor.algorithm.. This way, one test class would be > responsible for one algorithm, it would have less methods, and be easier to > understand. > > If there is no objection, I would like to create a patch with the test > classes under o.a.c.functor.algorithm, with one test for each algorithm and > using generics. > > Any thoughts on this? > > Thank you in advance! > -- > Bruno P. Kinoshita > http://www.kinoshita.eti.br > http://www.tupilabs.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org