Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com
 designates 209.85.213.171 as permitted sender)
From: Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_A349386B-D913-41D4-8ED9-0C33584D0265"
Subject: Re: [csv] Performance comparison
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:33:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VZb_ZvhCNL=g-srnCw_GttPJaV=DMLW49KDh3aBvpn2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
References: <4F5CB10C.507@apache.org> <4F5DD08A.6070309@apache.org>
 <4F5E90F4.7030003@apache.org>
 <CAOGo0VZYd0kH7fTD7wSOhEfn6E6=DRX4GWPSM8HYKpX7bzUQYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F5E94E7.2040908@apache.org>
 <CAOGo0VZb_ZvhCNL=g-srnCw_GttPJaV=DMLW49KDh3aBvpn2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <7E33F909-9D5F-4C80-9EC3-A18620FF8826@dslextreme.com>

--Apple-Mail=_A349386B-D913-41D4-8ED9-0C33584D0265
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1


On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:44 PM, sebb wrote:

> On 13 March 2012 00:29, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:
>> Le 13/03/2012 01:25, sebb a =E9crit :
>>=20
>>=20
>>> I'm concerned that the CSV code may grow and grow with private
>>> versions of code that could be provided by the JDK.
>>>=20
>>> By all means make sure the code is efficient in the way it uses the
>>> JDK classes, but I don't think we should be recoding standard =
classes.
>>=20
>>=20
>> I agree such a class should not live in [csv], but maybe in [io]?
>=20
> I don't think we should be trying to recode JDK classes.

If the implementations suck, why not?

Ralph


--Apple-Mail=_A349386B-D913-41D4-8ED9-0C33584D0265--