Hi James!
the email was posted twice because looks like you posted to old
jakarta address :P
The main reason because these interfaces are there, is that when I
started resurrecting it I just opened my Graph book, I started
defining element according to definitions :P
Some already implemented algorithms require specific informations
about edges - specifically WeightedEdges - so while for Vertex a
complete generalization can still be applied, Edge requires some
assumptions at a certain point.
Claudio is aware also about algorithms where weights are associated to
Vertex - he's preparing his PhD research on graphes - maybe he can
show us a more long-vision roadmap and evaluate benefits on
simplifying the design.
Do you have already a proposal how to modify the actual design?
TIA, all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:45 AM, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Sorry if this was double-posted. I think I accidentally sent it from
> my "personal" email account too (which isn't subscribed).
>
> Anyway, shouldn't we just let anything (perhaps restrict it to
> Serializables) be a vertex or an edge?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
|