Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of garydgregory@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJm2B-=35dA_OW+HvW_hWsfcWVhFJzjJ5Mysw-TX49Tv2Wr4cQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2BCFEAF8917CDD4FA171004072DB7D88AB90FD@indiambx02.corp.adobe.com>
	<CAJm2B-=35dA_OW+HvW_hWsfcWVhFJzjJ5Mysw-TX49Tv2Wr4cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:40:24 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CACZkXPzKphGpzJMCmBDVxGZpOi+4g6PEe8OSjur_5x3uw=-P4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [sanselan]:1.0 Release
From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3bafe532a37704b811f8aa

--e89a8f3bafe532a37704b811f8aa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

There is also the project renaming/repackaging to [imaging] that needs to
be done before 1.0.

See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/126548

Gary

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Shashank Gupta <shgupta@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have been using sanselan incubator 0.97 release which has performance
> issues on .tif format. I hope that the next 1.0 release version contains
> fixes around performance. When this big-bang release is scheduled?
> >
> > Also I checked the trunk source code and it seems that performance
> fixes(SANSELAN-56 to 58)  are not there in trunk. Any reason why this is
> the case?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Shashank
>
> Hi
>
> As for those performance fixes:
> * SANSELAN-56: ImagePrep is a good idea, but I'd rather integrate it
> into all the image formats, not just TIFF. Also, there is an even
> faster way to use the DataBuffer classes: that DataBufferInt
> constructor used is incompatible with some performance optimizations,
> like caching the image in video memory (see the Java 7 API for it).
> This will take time.
> * SANSELAN-57: this isn't a performance fix, but I do want to improve
> writing TIFF metadata before the 1.0 release. Several bugs in Jira are
> begging for it.
> * SANSELAN-58: the real solution here would be to rewrite the bit
> extractor so performance is improved in all cases, not just those few.
>
> I plan to include many patches in 1.0, including as many of those
> performance patches as possible. At this stage I don't know when it
> will be ready; hopefully in a few weeks.
>
> Damjan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

--e89a8f3bafe532a37704b811f8aa--