Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DBDD9654 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82361 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 12:50:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82026 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 12:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 82018 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2012 12:50:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.12.242.29] (HELO smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) (80.12.242.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:32 +0000 Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([2.29.16.156]) by mwinf5d11 with ME id YCq91i0073N1m1e03Cq94U; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:50:10 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986A8EAB3E8 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjZTi3OBSrDT for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.179.120.140] (unknown [213.205.224.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EC96EAB3E7 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:00 +0000 (GMT) References: <4F3447E6.5060404@apache.org> <4F34F3E6.9080505@apache.org> <6603299064722592058@unknownmsgid> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <6603299064722592058@unknownmsgid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][POOL] Logging options for Pool2 From: markt@apache.org Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:49:51 +0000 To: Commons Developers List Message-ID: <3a613ec5-b563-4c78-8a3e-1589c81f57f2@email.android.com> Gary Gregory wrote: >On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:39, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 10/02/2012 00:20, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> I have a preference fo juli. >> I can work with that. > >Is a dependency on JULI better than on common-logging? > >Or is there some confusion talking about JUL vs JULI? I was assuming java.util.logging rather than Tomcat's logging library JULI. Mark > >Gary >> >>> IIRC, Tomcat has a bridge from juli to logging impl, >> It is actually the other way around. Tomcat uses a package renamed >> commons-logging hard-coded to output to juli by default. It provides >a >> package renamed full commons-logging impl as well for users that want >to >> use something else (usually log4j). >> >>> it would help to keep [pool] dependencies-less. >> That is a very big advantage of juli. >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org