Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:48:15 +0100
From: Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [math] Merge of interface and implementation of *Test classes in
 stat.inference
Message-ID: <20120209214815.GG12351@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org
References: <4F2C3698.4010807@gmail.com>
 <20120203213324.GU12351@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
 <4F3413EA.9030706@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F3413EA.9030706@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: sif 20002; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1-exp at sif
X-Virus-Status: Clean

Hi.

> [...]
> What do you think?

No idea.

> @Exceptions: while working on the migration to the new exceptions in
> this package, I tried to stick to the rules from Phil/Luc:
> 
>  - add @throws clause to javadoc
>  - add throws declaration to method signature
> 
> for each individual exception that can be thrown.
> 
> This can lead to pretty elaborate signatures, see f.e.
> WilcoxonSignedRankTest#wilcoxonSignedRankTest(double[], double[], boolean)
> 
> Is it ok like that?

I strongly prefer _not_ to have the (unchecked) exceptions in the signature.
[Arguments mentioned numerous times in previous discussions...]


Best,
Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org