commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][POOL] Logging options for Pool2
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:20:05 GMT
I have a preference fo juli. IIRC, Tomcat has a bridge from juli to
logging impl, it would help to keep [pool] dependencies-less.


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark Thomas <> wrote:
> One of the big design decisions left for pool2 is whether or not to add
> logging. If logging is added then that opens up the what to log and with
> which logging framework questions.
> I do think some form of logging is required.
> See POOL-131 for one example of where logging could be useful.
> I have a preference for commons-logging. Partly since it is eating our
> own dog food, partly because it will make updating Tomcat to use pool2
> easier.
> I did have a random thought that we could do zero logging but emit JMX
> notifications if JMX was enabled. It avoids the "which framework" debate
> but uses an approach that is far less widely used in my experience.
> All this is because I am (hopefully) getting close to the point where
> the pool2 code is ready for an alpha release.
> Thoughts?
> Mark
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message