commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][POOL] Logging options for Pool2
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:09:16 GMT

On Feb 10, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:

> Le 10/02/2012 16:22, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> This would be good to know: What is the performance hit of the two
>> solutions above?
>> The question becomes: should pool2 depend on CL?
> Bridging JUL is probably not the most efficient solution, but if the application is not
very log intensive I think it's ok.
> For [pool2] I suggest using JUL.

Sorry, I suggest never using JUL unless it is a standalone app. Never use it in a library.
 Many people bridge the APIs and JUL is very inefficient to do.  

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message