commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <b...@systemoutprintln.de>
Subject Re: Should a vote about a commons wide checkstyle config be submitted to the PMC (was Re: Common checkstyle)
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:27:17 GMT
Hi,

for the record: since more than 72h have passed with no response, I 
guess we can drop this topic and leave everything the way it is.

Regards,
Benedikt

Am 25.02.2012 17:33, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Hi,
>
> for some reason this discussion ended without a result. Maybe it is time
> to summarize what has been discussed so far.
>
> This all goes back to a commit by Gary, that fixed several check style
> issues in VFS [1]. The following discussion between Gary and Ralph and
> others [2] showed, that there are several thinks unclear regarding the
> check style configurations in commons:
>
> - which configuration to use when starting a new project
> - if the check style configuration of a project can be changed
> - if there is a commons wide check style configuration, that all
> projects could agree on
>
> It was then suggested to call a vote on whether there should be a
> commons wide check style configuration. This question is still unanswered.
>
> Arguments for a commons wide configuration:
>
> - it is easier for people to swap between projects and for new
> contributers to get started
> - Commons is one subproject of the ASF, so it should have only one style
> - all source code would be formated the same way (making it "common" )
>
> Arguments against a commons wide configuration:
>
> - several projects have evolved their configuration in different ways,
> making it hard to find a commons wide style
> - Reformatting will be a lot of work
> - teams should be able to choose their own style
> - most people only develop a few components, so that the swapping is not
> that much of an issue
> - Technical restrictions (where to place such a commons wide check style
> file?)
>
> As a solution to those arguments it was proposed to have a default check
> style configuration, that can be used for new projects. This
> configuration may be overwritten by the different components if they
> feel the need.
>
> So now we have to answer the question: Should a vote be submitted to the
> PMC?
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/4yxhoefo37tpighf
> [2] http://markmail.org/thread/m337z45fe2d7dps2
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message