commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ma...@apache.org
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][POOL] Logging options for Pool2
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:49:51 GMT
Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:39, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10/02/2012 00:20, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> I have a preference fo juli.
>> I can work with that.
>
>Is a dependency on JULI better than on common-logging?
>
>Or is there some confusion talking about JUL vs JULI?

I was assuming java.util.logging rather than Tomcat's logging library JULI.

Mark
>
>Gary
>>
>>> IIRC, Tomcat has a bridge from juli to logging impl,
>> It is actually the other way around. Tomcat uses a package renamed
>> commons-logging hard-coded to output to juli by default. It provides
>a
>> package renamed full commons-logging impl as well for users that want
>to
>> use something else (usually log4j).
>>
>>> it would help to keep [pool] dependencies-less.
>> That is a very big advantage of juli.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message