commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gilles Sadowski <>
Subject Re: [math] Merge of interface and implementation of *Test classes in stat.inference
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:48:15 GMT

> [...]
> What do you think?

No idea.

> @Exceptions: while working on the migration to the new exceptions in
> this package, I tried to stick to the rules from Phil/Luc:
>  - add @throws clause to javadoc
>  - add throws declaration to method signature
> for each individual exception that can be thrown.
> This can lead to pretty elaborate signatures, see f.e.
> WilcoxonSignedRankTest#wilcoxonSignedRankTest(double[], double[], boolean)
> Is it ok like that?

I strongly prefer _not_ to have the (unchecked) exceptions in the signature.
[Arguments mentioned numerous times in previous discussions...]


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message