Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9C94B208 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93298 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 15:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93180 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 15:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93171 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2012 15:16:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:45 +0000 Received: by vbbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so11001033vbb.30 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:16:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yOLClwWPKymp1wNVJPKscErkjgjBIA8Qr+WM9bdj/Dc=; b=w/uokRw9Q+JKLdVetbADDjmywmyCPwflVKMCvvEwNXcYVhSS9DY6MrYuZSRYIXv8di Ap4LbaJ/wN/AokRBlWHzFV1BRUJOe0MTVb5ei95x0G18FJLphBRDz6Q+1fbN9TfWv9LE fK7CEchcUEoVznyoOcnrc7LLg786HpE5ICvVs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.242 with SMTP id x18mr6214108vdf.39.1326726984908; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.0.129 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:16:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F143902.20005@systemoutprintln.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:24 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ALL] suggestion for improvement: Unify homepage layout for all commons subprojects From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the > Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with > that. The major problem was that it did not meet the branding requirements. > We should put it on our table again, as the current Commons site > looks like we are jdk 1.3 users (ok, we support 1.3 on some places, > but this does not mean we should be proud of that ;-)) > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> looking at the different commons project pages, it occurs to me, that all >> pages use a slightly different layout. For example comparing Lang, BeanUtils >> and Collections with one another the first thing are the page titles: >> >> - Home >> - BeanUtils - Commons >> - Collections - Home >> >> If I were to rate this titles, I would say that "BeanUtils - Commons" is the >> best one, followed by "Collections - Home". "Home" from Lang's project page >> is clearly the worst page title I can think of. >> >> Looking at the content area, there is not much to complain about. All three >> content areas are structured nearly the same way (although IMHO BeanUtils >> content area is a bit overloaded with release informations). >> >> When it comes to the sidebar, things get completely inconsistent. >> First of all: Why doesn't Lang's homepage has a link so ApacheCon? >> Why does BeanUtils have a Documentation are and a Project Documentation >> area? >> Where do I get all the informations about developing BeanUtils from (as Lang >> and Collections have a distinct development area)? >> Why does Lang's ASF area have more links than the ones of the others? >> Why do the release history pages of all three projects look so completely >> different? >> >> In addition to that, I think that one thing is really missing on all of the >> three above mentioned pages: There is no road map for future releases! How >> can I know if I should wait for the next Collections release, that provides >> generics or better start my new project using the latest release? Maybe it >> will be out next week, maybe I have to wait one year. I don't know... There >> really has to be a road map, so that the users know when they can expect the >> next release and what they can expect from it. >> >> I guess, I have made my point clear, and I bet that looking at other commons >> project pages would result in finding even more layout variants. >> I don't want to study the page layout all over again, when I browse through >> the different project pages. I want everything to be at the same place (as >> far as possible). So I propose to unify all page layouts. This post is not >> supposed to present the perfect layout, but rather be a discussion starter >> on how such a layout could look like (if you guys think that a unified >> layout is needed at all...). >> >> Regards >> Benedikt >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org