Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6FDC9FB3 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84317 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2012 09:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 83262 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2012 09:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 83186 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2012 09:41:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:41:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.43] (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:41:47 +0000 Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so5262848vbb.30 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:41:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pvWZkQLDImQ5MKGuMJ522pJS0S1h+Ue/z7413dQlSH0=; b=A9BCrTHRK/4/ziA8wig1+m0AWR+MUkO6RtBDBh69067lEfZkYnwdx3scdoEp0BKa8E tS2xJNlzPjfCCcR2E9O9OctMy/ITM+5TRj32Hq2K6FX79dEh7Jt0fgoqDjXV3pJo/Zei UyH+O0e4DyiJPNrwMgm0s3qXU/a1WqssrmJF8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.136 with SMTP id ei8mr657357vdb.73.1326447686799; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:41:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: simone.tripodi@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.71.10 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:41:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:41:26 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 21_Fmv5d-NIS5F5Vytwt5DYFtnQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support From: Simone Tripodi To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> I'm tempted to go as far as to say it's irresponsible of us to support 1.5 :)> +1 and IMHO innovation blocking as well moreover from the commons homepage: "The Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable Java components." that doesn't mean to me "helping companies on keep their libraries up-to-date for their needs" When doing OSS I _personally_ don't care about what 3rd part companies need - unless they are interested on paying me to develop/maintain their *custom* components - but how the software can evolve. Let's take the [collections] Vs guava case once again: we didn't let collections evolve to not lose old users, but people simply switched to google-collections/guava. That proves that evolution is not always evil as it appears. This fact reminds me some Gordon Ramsey's kitchen nightmare episodes :) Of course, I still have a lot to learn about what *real* OSS community development is, but that's the reason why I am here and not somewhere else. Just my 0.002 opinion, all the best -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org