commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: help for scxml conformance update
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:02:06 GMT
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo L├╝tkebohle
> <iluetkeb@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
>>
>>> Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put into bringing the
>>> code upto conformance in over a year. If you're keen to work on some
>>> issues over others, I suggest you simply make a note of that by
>>> commenting on the appropriate ticket in JIRA (and creating a new one
>>> if such doesn't exist) and when you feel you have a fix / solution,
>>> please attach a patch with appropriate test cases to the JIRA
>>> issue(s).
>>
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>> One question: I was going to start on implementing the "content" child of
>> invoke statements and noticed that SCXML-146 has the title <invoke>, without
>> further comments though. There are a couple tickets like that, most
>> associated with Jacob Beard. Has that work stopped?
>
> That work was related to my Google Summer of Code 2010 project,
> scxml-js. Those tickets were children of the following task:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-120
> This work has now stopped, and these tasks should probably be closed
> as "won't fix". I can go ahead and clean this up.
>
<snip/>

Jake - Yup, such cleanup would be useful, thanks.


>>
>> Also, are you aware of a specific change-log between the last draft and the
>> current draft? I noticed a couple of things that are missing/different, but
>> a changelog would make it much easier to check everything.
>
<snap/>

Ingo - Right, we could do better in this area. We have SVN history,
release notes and this old changelog [1], but a draft-by-draft status
/ comparison would be nice indeed. Something to start documenting
going forward if there is interest.

-Rahul

[1] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/changes-report.html


> Note that the last time I looked at the Algorithm for SCXML
> Intepreteration, it had a serious bug:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2011JanMar/0043.html
> It appears they have changed the algorithm since then to support
> internal transitions and late binding data, so perhaps this bug has
> been fixed in later revisions as well.
>
> Jake
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message