commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [math] Transposable linear operators
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:42:43 GMT
The shorter name is fine.

Operate is a bit funky.  A more traditional verb would be be apply()


2012/1/12 S├ębastien Brisard <sebastien.brisard@m4x.org>

> Last question (***to native english speakers***): I'm not sure
> isTransposable() really means what I would like it to mean. What do
> you think of
> boolean isTranspositionSupported()?
>
> Likewise, is this name OK
> RealVector operateTranspose(RealVector)
> considering that application of the real linear operator a is called
> RealVector operate(RealVector).
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message