Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6C997A00 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85856 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2011 19:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85756 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2011 19:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85748 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2011 19:02:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:02:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:01:55 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RXdnD-0001Ci-6g for dev@commons.apache.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:01:35 -0800 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:01:35 -0800 (PST) From: henrib To: dev@commons.apache.org Message-ID: <1323111695167-4161736.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1323094640213-4160635.post@n4.nabble.com> <1323103588404-4161262.post@n4.nabble.com> <1323108612136-4161571.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Can the next version major version of a project require Java6? (i.e. drop Java 1.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit sebb-2-2 wrote > > Indeed, ideally everyone would now be using Java 6 and Windows users > should all upgrade to Windows 7 etc. > But even if it were the case, you'd still argue for us to continue using IE6... -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Can-the-next-version-major-version-of-a-project-require-Java6-i-e-drop-Java-1-5-tp4160635p4161736.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org