Hi,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> I am thinking of a different package name, not just version for VFS on
> Java 7 because we might want to release more VFS2-based versions that do
> break binary compatibility.
>
> We can retain the VFS name and brand for the project, but I'd prefer
> o.a.c.vfs<n> to be for VFS2 based work and to create o.a.c.filesystem (or
> fs) for Java 7 FileSystem-based work.
>
> Thoughts?
Until now we had the policy to add the major number to the package name i.e.
this is org.apache.commons.vfs3 here.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
|