commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <>
Subject Re: [sanselan] how to build a release
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:46:41 GMT
On 19 December 2011 08:53, Jörg Schaible <> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
>>> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
>>> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
>>> looks and feels less scattered.
>>> Op Ed:
>>> On a different tak, personally, I've never liked sanselan as a package
>>> in the [commons] universe. I want to just see org.apache.commons.image
>>> or some such. Just like we have .io, .lang, .net, and so on. All
>>> commons packages are functional IIRC, not some goofy name.
>> +1 - we talked about this IIRC when [sanselan] was incubating and
>> decided not to force the name change.  I think it was to make it
>> easier for then current users and developers to keep engagement /
>> momentum.  I think its worth asking again now that it has moved into
>> Commons and repackaging is going to be necessary anyway.  Why not
>> just change to o.a.c.image?
> +1
> IMHO renaming it to "image" will attract more users, simply because everyone
> then knows what to expect from this component simply by looking at the name.

I presume we are also talking about renaming the component?
So the website becomes ?
And likewise for SVN?

If so, then I think the proposal needs a general Commons vote to become valid.

We can add a redirect for the web-site (but not for SVN AFAIK - that
would have to be a readme).

> - Jörg
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message