commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [ognl] Old issues....
Date Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:16:47 GMT
Hi Mark,
please don't get me wrong,  I did not want to underestimate your or infra
work (which on the contrary I really appreciate), I just answered to
Christian's question, which thought that: "... the OGNL stuff will go there
too?".
Unfortunately OGNL and XWork projects share the same dump, but have
different teams. I think this is the major cause of every misunderstanding.

With that said,  in the perspective of using the everyone time with
respect, even if I know that is not the best way,  I can live with
copy&paste from OS.
So my +1 from Copy&Paste.

Maurizio Cucchiara


On 13 December 2011 17:06, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:

> I suggest you read all of that Jira. That isn't what happened at all. A
> more accurate summary would be that infra (me included) got tired of
> being messed about and spending a whole lot of our free time getting the
> data in a fit state to be imported only to be told that we needed to
> start again with a different set of data.
>
> Importing from an old version of Jira is a non-trivial exercise and the
> ASF infra team is not an infinite resource.
>
> In this particular case the infra position is that we will gladly import
> the data once the project gets it into a suitable state to do so. What
> infra will not be doing, is doing that work again for the project. If
> the project wants those issues imported, the project will have to do the
> work this time.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message