Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <j9k86d$cc5$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: 
 <CAPVuaYtos0E-yA1d8eUk6RR+6DBY4T3ZTpTjr2G=DRCdz_s29g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACZkXPwE2ynx4R=-7Cy86y9nDUD5g10gDT0z5Vz-1Zyef8=Afg@mail.gmail.com>
	<j9ihhd$bro$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAPVuaYusO9N+MzeLcy4OmfKYUpdVE9hVO6f1XjX7_9Nazc67_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPVuaYukVVsxxpOpaNg=GzxpQFzOv7Jk0bx977uyVtUoony4-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY4MgjvPR02D+BC7jJJcJmA=cSPCFQX_mk7NS1+myi9csg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPVuaYvXP7xL0wqSrfKwYPPesx_AOH6asXndBg=sQBW4df3NoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY4djwL0A6_T5o_z8bO1BvUyKGf675EFaMkyXvmyRc-zMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<j9jqor$jg7$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAPVuaYtkAHL1KmL73bLTC6erBh62bH0=uWqCKHGxaXnep-s_DA@mail.gmail.com>
	<j9k7si$cc5$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<j9k86d$cc5$2@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:10:02 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAPVuaYtr1By7Jjp0-ab=tOW2H8izh-5gji4WSO8Mx1MNXB+hmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.1 (Based on RC1)
From: Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks J=F6rg.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM, J=F6rg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de> wr=
ote:

> Well, building 3.1 with 21 parent (as 3.0.1) let's 3.1 succeed also.
> Therefore +1 for 3.1, but I really wonder what triggers this with the 22
> parent and Java 7 on our 64-bit Linux machines.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org