Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2DA1979C for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 04:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54579 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 04:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 54509 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2011 04:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 54501 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2011 04:43:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:43:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gsterijevski@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.43] (HELO mail-yw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.213.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:43:43 +0000 Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so155441ywt.30 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=owsIiAeQuZ33eKDyUXEZF1pt+59eSeMhCGdq0cpEYxY=; b=qDai6Oe8vw7HtY44nF0sISXfD9Ng1DWvvdexEOb7pB++nbK7V95UGu08gorbOfJgRh IGbdHslYCzXkYD9ZL8DHE17R/uLaGvcx3qFpIml4z6ePpnZPOrLuz4diM03qDJI83DUk ZOSfgQsCutti1aCC+OehKHJJD6gN8rirmWsE4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.15.226 with SMTP id a2mr10781813pbd.93.1317962602465; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.199.10 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 21:43:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E8C9946.3040404@free.fr> <20111005203857.GC17021@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> <4E8D5D01.3050408@free.fr> <20111006205653.GE17021@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:43:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [MATH] Re: Pivoting QR Decomposition: Take Two! From: Greg Sterijevski To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51dd197bf493f04aeae1429 --bcaec51dd197bf493f04aeae1429 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Lets a) stop top-posting (Gilles has asked politely a couple of times now) > and b) stay focused on solving the problems we actually have. We could > endlessly debate refactoring approaches. Sorry about the top posting, I am big culprit here... Was not aware that the mailing list's protocol was being violated. Will interleave from now on. Or we could fix the stuff blocking 3.0 and get a release out. Let's do > that. > > Will push the pivoting QR under JIRA MATH-630. There will be a few checkstyle errors. I apologize in advance. Was not suggesting the whole codebase should be refactored, just looking for the right way to push pivoting QR into the mix. The thread began with a suggestion of using only the pivoting QR (meaning dropping the non pivoting one). The discussion brought us to the understanding that both implementations should be retained. I feel it has been a useful discussion-whether we use factories or not. > Phil > > -Greg --bcaec51dd197bf493f04aeae1429--