Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4E9979B7.2050703@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:16:55 +0200
From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ognl] SVN $ID and @author
References: 
 <CAPFNckjs2S22E9Oe-orkgi2Rt41yuexbFtQe-Y3ca49Q7bG90g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPFNckjs2S22E9Oe-orkgi2Rt41yuexbFtQe-Y3ca49Q7bG90g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

-0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL.

I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work. But 
feel free to remove your own name.

Emmanuel Bourg


Le 15/10/2011 10:59, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
> Again, the old discussion.
>
> OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I
> prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn
> history.
>
> In addition:
>   * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $
>
> This line must not be the first of the license header, otherwise
> checkstyle is crying. In addition I have never understood the sense of
> that line. I am +1 for removing it too (svn history does all i need).
>
> If we keep it, we need to move it on class level docs.
>
> OK, let the rumble begin... your opinions gents!
>
> CHeers
> Christian
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org