Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 03:20:30 +0200
From: Gilles Sadowski <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: BOBYQA Question
Message-ID: <20111002012030.GP17021@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@commons.apache.org
References: 
 <CACMPRi0Sd+kAwjO7uR5Yfxqg7gGgeE3UUygRLd+-82Bb-MNoag@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110929230639.GK17021@dusk.harfang.homelinux.org>
 <CACMPRi0sOWKTxLxAHPcUvCr9WpoT_=W2Uw1=7K9dx7+7zN9PzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACMPRi0sOWKTxLxAHPcUvCr9WpoT_=W2Uw1=7K9dx7+7zN9PzQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: hel 20001; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1-exp at hel
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:35:28PM -0500, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Gilles,
> 
> I have attached a test harness which shows one spot where BOBYQA fails.
> 
> See the "NonLinearConjugateGradient" thread.

I don't know where you "attached" a unit test.

For new tests that exercise coverage, I think that, for the time being, it
might be safer to put them in another class, e.g.
  BOBYQAOptimizerCoverageTest
so that we can easily enable/disable them (with the "@Ignore" annotation).
Thus, it would be easier to spot what was missing from the original test
suite.


Thanks,
Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org