commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [compress] XZ support
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:24:17 GMT
On 25 October 2011 09:50, Torsten Curdt <tcurdt@vafer.org> wrote:
>>> So I would only release the shaded jar.
>>
>> IIRC sebb objected to shading.
>
> Why was that, sebb?

I don't recall saying that I objected; I did wonder what advantage it
would give.

> I cannot think of a good reason why this should be a problem.

Maybe not in this case, but if the dependency is then updated AIUI
using shading would prevent the user from updating the dependency
independently.

>>  We have the choice of releasing only a
>> shaded jar, only a plain jar with a POM that states a hard-dependency
>> or releasing two artifacts.
>
> You know my preference :)

Now that XZ is in Maven, it seems to me the simplest solution is to
have a dependency on it.

I would be inclined to try that first, and then move to shading if
really required.

> cheers,
> Torsten
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message