commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [MATH] Re: Pivoting QR Decomposition: Take Two!
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:05:07 GMT
Why were these removed?  Was it because the alternative implementations
weren't different enough?

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe <Luc.Maisonobe@free.fr>wrote:

> Le 06/10/2011 04:04, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>
>>
>>> What is the group's feeling on factory classes? +1 from me (obviously)
>>>
>>>  +1 for me, I like factories.
>>
>
> -0. We used factories and removed most of them. In fact, what we removed
> was when factories are used to hide implementation and only an interface and
> a factory are available to users. This is a different cases.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message